mathemagier: Ten years of experience!! (Default)
Hermann Gottlieb ([personal profile] mathemagier) wrote2025-08-03 01:28 pm

IC Contact Post

[Screened calls go straight to voicemail, where an impatient recording answers]

You've reached Dr. Hermann Gottlieb. Leave your name, number, and business if you expect a return call. Thank you.
superposition: ((what are we talking about?))

[personal profile] superposition 2016-01-22 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, provided they don't have countermeasures. The Porter's been known to interfere with that kind of thing before, and if they've got something similar...

[... Oh wait, he was trying to be reassuring here. Well, but - no, he's not going to sugarcoat things for Hermann, the man has a right to full disclosure.]

... if that's the case, we'll find a workaround. Cross that bridge when we come to it.
superposition: ((tight-lipped))

[personal profile] superposition 2016-01-22 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
Of course it has. How else do you explain us?
superposition: (So what difference does it make?)

[personal profile] superposition 2016-01-22 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Interdimensional, interplanetary, international... [You can't see it, but he's waving his hand in a demonstrative fashion.] It's got the ability to abduct people across dimensional barriers, space, and time, for God's sake. Compared to that, half a planet is nothing.
superposition: (You won't see me anymore)

[personal profile] superposition 2016-01-22 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Oh - oh, you meant the interference? No, no, I meant - I'm sure you remember that debacle in my lab a few months back? The more follow-up I've done on that, the more signs are pointing to the Porter as the source. It's subtle. A spin here, a quark there. Little errors that, on their own, wouldn't be a problem, but as you start scaling up they propagate catastrophically. Whatever wave function the Porter's using, it interferes with mine. Maybe vice versa, too, I'd need more data - but that's not the point. That interference is present everywhere the wave function exists, which is to say, everywhere. Omniscience has nothing to do with it.

... Except the observer effect, possibly, but you don't need omniscience for that.

[Things Qubit should be working on: probably not this.]